| At the end of the 19th
century the Hungarian justice system underwent a process of radical reform.
To build the foundation of a unified court system, a network of county
courts was established under Act XXXII of 1871.
In the interest of creating a system of uniform administration of justice,
the idea of consolidating the five district courts of Budapest was born
as early as the turn of the century.
Following the adoption of Act XXV of 1913, the Central Royal County Court
of Budapest was called into existence as an integrated legal forum to
consider civil cases exclusively. For the adjudication of all criminal
cases in the capital, the independent Criminal Court of Budapest was estabilished.
The structure housing the Central Royal County Court of Budapest at 25
Markó street was erected based on plans by the architect Ferenc Jablonszky.
According to the original plans, the building completed on August 1, 1914
was to have four stories but, acceding ot the demands of influential politicians
and ministry officials, and mindful of future needs for expansion, an
additional floor was added. The approved plans called for a building with
a floor area of over 32 thousand square metres and a total of 324 offices,
among them 87 courtrooms and 108 chambers reserved for judges.
Working with limited resources, the architect conceived of a structure
housing the court of first instance as having a Spartan design, while
using the best and most durable materials available at the time. Accordingly,
the eclectic building presenting a robust exterior and lacking excessive
embellishments, features primarily the characteristic elements of neo-Romanesque
architecture.
As stated in the original plans, the vaulted and glasscovered hall located
in the centre of the building was meant to serve as the “collecting basin
of the public seeking legal redress”.
According to the functional organisation of the court at the time, all
trials started at this point as chief judges' chambers and courtrooms
opened onto this central foyer.
For reason of economy already mentioned above, in the design, decoration
and furnishing of the interior the architect was guided by the principles
of simplicity and necessity.
Courtrooms were furnished uniformly, where the judge's bench and a highbacked
armchair were placed on a dais. The clerk of the court sat next to the
judge, while at each end of the judge's bench, attorneys sat behind facing
tables. The chambers were also equipped with the same oak furniture; along
with a desk, a bookcase and three armchairs, a file-stool, a small writing
table and a coat-rack provided additional comfort.
Despite practical considerations and an emphasis on durability, the simple
design hides a number of intriguring solutions. These include the tiles
used in hallways, supplied by the Zsolnay Porcelan-Fayence Company renowned
across Europe. Floors were covered with polished marble-mosaic tiles,
walls with glazed tiles and doors were framdd in cast marble. Special
features include the central time pieces an a light-signalling system.
In the heyday of the institution, a precision pendulum-clock stood in
the office manager's room, which kept time synchronised electronically
with all 130 clocks installed in court rooms, clerks' rooms and the main
lobby. The light-signalling system served to advise attorneys (who would
often gather and wait in an empty courtroom) of the exact time when their
case would come before the judges. The system allowed a precise rotation,
calling only those whose presence was needed at any specific stage of
the trial.
Over the intervening decades, the Budapest
Central Royal Court underwent a number of structural reform. From the
mid-1950s, the administration of justice was decentralised again. Soon
after, however, centralising tendencies gained predominance and the local
district court with jurisdiction over the city's central districts operated
on the left side of the Danube as Pest Central District Court. In the
final stage of the centralisation process, January 1, 1984 the 17th District
Court lost its independence as well when its was attached to the central
districts. As a result, the jurisdiction of the Pest Central District
Court extended to several Budapest districts (i.e., districts 5, 6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16 and 17), and continues to operate in the same structure
to this day. The population of these districts exceeds 800 000, explaining
the exceptionally high number of civil and criminal cases coming before
the court.
|
|